Home Case Index All Cases Companies Law Companies Law + HC Companies Law - 2013 (10) TMI HC This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2013 (10) TMI 622 - KERALA HIGH COURTDishonour of Cheque u/s 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act – Held that:- The complainant had failed to prove his case and acquitted the accused - The complainant had failed to prove that the accused borrowed and issued cheque Ext.P1. On the other hand, the version of DW1 that while he had subscribed to a kuri conducted by Parur Kuries in which PW1 was the Manager, the accused had entrusted two blank signed cheques to him and he misused one of the same and created Ext.P1 - That being so, I find no merit in the appeal and the same was liable to be dismissed - The counsel for the appellant canvassed for a remand so that the appellant will get an opportunity to prove the transaction in dispute - After a lapse of so many years, I am not inclined to grant his request. Further, I have accepted the case of the accused regarding the issuance of a blank signed cheque - Therefore, the request of the counsel for the appellant for a remand was rejected.
|