Home Case Index All Cases Indian Laws Indian Laws + HC Indian Laws - 2013 (11) TMI HC This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2013 (11) TMI 499 - HC - Indian LawsDenial of Second ACP due to Respendent - ACR entry not communicated on date of denial - Whether the petitioners were justified in relying upon the non-communicated ACR of the first respondent to decide the issue relating to his eligibility to get Second ACP - Held that:- as ACR entries, namely "Just adequate" made in the Service Register insofar as the first respondent is concerned, were not communicated as on the crucial date, i.e., on 6.8.2007, the said ACR entries cannot be relied on by the petitioners to consider the claim of the respondent seeking Second ACP from 6.8.2007 - Second petitioner, namely, Additional Commissioner of Customs, ADC, Unit Mandapam Road, Ramanathapuram is directed to consider the said aspect and pass fresh orders - Following decision of Abhijit Ghose Dastidar v s. Union of India [2008 (10) TMI 599 - SUPREME COURT] - Decided in favour of Petitioner.
|