TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + SC Income Tax - 2014 (3) TMI SC This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2014 (3) TMI 652 - SC - Income Tax


  1. 2022 (10) TMI 948 - SC
  2. 2023 (3) TMI 566 - SCH
  3. 2024 (10) TMI 712 - HC
  4. 2024 (1) TMI 1386 - HC
  5. 2021 (8) TMI 1363 - HC
  6. 2020 (3) TMI 1080 - HC
  7. 2018 (1) TMI 807 - HC
  8. 2017 (9) TMI 1621 - HC
  9. 2017 (9) TMI 532 - HC
  10. 2017 (9) TMI 970 - HC
  11. 2017 (4) TMI 1154 - HC
  12. 2017 (2) TMI 1310 - HC
  13. 2017 (2) TMI 32 - HC
  14. 2016 (12) TMI 247 - HC
  15. 2016 (8) TMI 518 - HC
  16. 2015 (9) TMI 558 - HC
  17. 2015 (8) TMI 183 - HC
  18. 2015 (7) TMI 922 - HC
  19. 2015 (3) TMI 99 - HC
  20. 2014 (11) TMI 1082 - HC
  21. 2014 (6) TMI 477 - HC
  22. 2025 (6) TMI 1127 - AT
  23. 2025 (5) TMI 2150 - AT
  24. 2025 (5) TMI 2040 - AT
  25. 2025 (4) TMI 1043 - AT
  26. 2025 (5) TMI 1784 - AT
  27. 2025 (4) TMI 327 - AT
  28. 2025 (2) TMI 601 - AT
  29. 2025 (3) TMI 799 - AT
  30. 2025 (1) TMI 383 - AT
  31. 2025 (4) TMI 1252 - AT
  32. 2024 (12) TMI 1532 - AT
  33. 2024 (10) TMI 1559 - AT
  34. 2024 (11) TMI 226 - AT
  35. 2024 (9) TMI 197 - AT
  36. 2024 (9) TMI 196 - AT
  37. 2024 (8) TMI 534 - AT
  38. 2024 (8) TMI 808 - AT
  39. 2024 (7) TMI 952 - AT
  40. 2024 (7) TMI 279 - AT
  41. 2024 (6) TMI 727 - AT
  42. 2024 (6) TMI 725 - AT
  43. 2024 (6) TMI 801 - AT
  44. 2024 (3) TMI 376 - AT
  45. 2024 (6) TMI 1345 - AT
  46. 2024 (7) TMI 444 - AT
  47. 2023 (11) TMI 497 - AT
  48. 2023 (11) TMI 696 - AT
  49. 2023 (9) TMI 1511 - AT
  50. 2023 (8) TMI 1519 - AT
  51. 2023 (8) TMI 766 - AT
  52. 2023 (8) TMI 149 - AT
  53. 2023 (7) TMI 799 - AT
  54. 2023 (5) TMI 415 - AT
  55. 2023 (7) TMI 6 - AT
  56. 2023 (6) TMI 1165 - AT
  57. 2023 (5) TMI 414 - AT
  58. 2023 (4) TMI 92 - AT
  59. 2023 (1) TMI 412 - AT
  60. 2023 (1) TMI 213 - AT
  61. 2022 (11) TMI 1253 - AT
  62. 2022 (11) TMI 1054 - AT
  63. 2022 (7) TMI 1557 - AT
  64. 2022 (9) TMI 330 - AT
  65. 2022 (6) TMI 641 - AT
  66. 2022 (6) TMI 659 - AT
  67. 2022 (5) TMI 334 - AT
  68. 2022 (3) TMI 424 - AT
  69. 2022 (1) TMI 890 - AT
  70. 2022 (2) TMI 1083 - AT
  71. 2021 (11) TMI 319 - AT
  72. 2021 (9) TMI 1482 - AT
  73. 2021 (8) TMI 1088 - AT
  74. 2021 (8) TMI 763 - AT
  75. 2021 (5) TMI 726 - AT
  76. 2021 (3) TMI 930 - AT
  77. 2021 (2) TMI 739 - AT
  78. 2021 (1) TMI 467 - AT
  79. 2020 (11) TMI 959 - AT
  80. 2020 (8) TMI 715 - AT
  81. 2020 (9) TMI 140 - AT
  82. 2020 (6) TMI 2 - AT
  83. 2020 (6) TMI 426 - AT
  84. 2020 (3) TMI 1147 - AT
  85. 2019 (9) TMI 772 - AT
  86. 2019 (4) TMI 561 - AT
  87. 2019 (3) TMI 1674 - AT
  88. 2019 (2) TMI 622 - AT
  89. 2018 (5) TMI 1485 - AT
  90. 2018 (4) TMI 789 - AT
  91. 2018 (3) TMI 1903 - AT
  92. 2018 (3) TMI 809 - AT
  93. 2018 (2) TMI 732 - AT
  94. 2017 (10) TMI 824 - AT
  95. 2017 (11) TMI 1559 - AT
  96. 2017 (6) TMI 241 - AT
  97. 2017 (5) TMI 905 - AT
  98. 2017 (4) TMI 1409 - AT
  99. 2017 (2) TMI 688 - AT
  100. 2017 (1) TMI 1085 - AT
  101. 2016 (9) TMI 1042 - AT
  102. 2017 (2) TMI 698 - AT
  103. 2016 (9) TMI 1064 - AT
  104. 2016 (6) TMI 453 - AT
  105. 2016 (4) TMI 160 - AT
  106. 2015 (11) TMI 990 - AT
  107. 2015 (12) TMI 137 - AT
  108. 2015 (9) TMI 1240 - AT
  109. 2015 (10) TMI 482 - AT
  110. 2015 (10) TMI 15 - AT
  111. 2015 (7) TMI 1327 - AT
  112. 2015 (7) TMI 1328 - AT
  113. 2015 (3) TMI 1377 - AT
  114. 2015 (5) TMI 759 - AT
  115. 2015 (3) TMI 1289 - AT
  116. 2015 (2) TMI 323 - AT
  117. 2015 (1) TMI 1102 - AT
  118. 2015 (2) TMI 7 - AT
  119. 2014 (12) TMI 1399 - AT
  120. 2014 (12) TMI 250 - AT
  121. 2014 (11) TMI 1220 - AT
  122. 2014 (11) TMI 444 - AT
  123. 2014 (8) TMI 1036 - AT
  124. 2014 (9) TMI 81 - AT
The core legal questions considered in this judgment revolve around the nature and classification of the respondent-trust for income tax exemption purposes under the Income Tax Act, 1961. Specifically, the issues are:

1. Whether the respondent-trust is a public religious trust or a charitable trust, or a composite trust with both religious and charitable purposes.

2. Whether the provisions of Section 13(1)(b) of the Income Tax Act, which deny exemption to trusts created for the benefit of a particular religious community or caste, apply to the respondent-trust.

3. Whether the findings of fact by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal regarding the nature of the trust are subject to interference by the High Court and the Supreme Court under Section 260-A of the Act.

4. The interpretation and application of relevant provisions of the Income Tax Act, namely Sections 11, 12, 12A, 12AA, and 13, in relation to the eligibility of the trust for exemption.

Issue-wise detailed analysis:

Issue 1: Classification of the Trust as Religious, Charitable, or Composite

The relevant legal framework includes the definitions and provisions under the Income Tax Act, particularly Sections 2(15), 11, 12, 12A, and 12AA. Section 2(15) defines "charitable purpose" inclusively, covering relief of the poor, education, medical relief, preservation of environment, monuments, and advancement of objects of general public utility, with certain exceptions related to commercial activities. "Religious purpose" is not statutorily defined but is understood in legal and dictionary terms as activities relating to religion, including propagation, observance of rituals, and religious education.

Precedents cited include various Supreme Court decisions interpreting charitable and religious purposes, such as CIT v. Surat Art Silk Cloth Manufacturers' Assn., Thiagarajar Charities v. CIT, and others establishing the "predominant purpose" test and the public benefit requirement.

The Court examined the objects of the respondent-trust as set out in the trust deed, which include arranging religious meals (nyaz and majlis) on religious occasions, providing religious education through Madarsa, assisting needy persons for religious activities, and carrying out religious activities according to Shariat-e-Mohammediyah for the Dawoodi Bohra community.

The Tribunal had found the trust to be a public religious trust, relying on references to the Holy Quran and religious tenets. The High Court accepted this finding as a factual conclusion and declined to interfere.

However, the Supreme Court emphasized that the classification of the trust is not a mere question of fact but involves the legal effect of the proven facts, i.e., the objects of the trust. The Court held that the objects reflect a dual tenor of religious and charitable purposes. For example, providing food on religious occasions is a charitable activity with public utility since it is not restricted to members of the Dawoodi Bohra community. Similarly, establishing Madarsa for religious education qualifies as charitable under education.

The Court distinguished purely religious objects (such as objects (c) and (f) related to religious obligations for the community) from charitable objects that benefit the public at large. It noted that the objects must be analyzed in light of customary law and community standards to determine whether the benefits are restricted to a particular community or are public.

Thus, the Court concluded that the respondent-trust is a composite trust with both charitable and religious objects, eligible for exemption under the Act subject to other provisions.

Issue 2: Applicability of Section 13(1)(b) of the Income Tax Act

Section 13(1)(b) excludes from exemption income of a trust created or established for the benefit of any particular religious community or caste. The provision applies to charitable trusts and denies exemption if the trust benefits only a particular community.

The Tribunal and High Court held that Section 13(1)(b) applies only to charitable trusts and not to religious trusts, and since the respondent-trust was held to be religious, the provision did not apply.

The Supreme Court disagreed with this narrow interpretation. It held that Section 13(1)(b) applies to trusts with charitable purposes, including composite trusts with both charitable and religious objects. The key question is whether the charitable purpose benefits a particular religious community or caste.

The Court referred to precedents such as Sole Trustee, Loka Shikshana Trust v. CIT and CIT v. Palghat Shadi Mahal Trust, which held that trusts restricting benefits to a particular community fall within Section 13(1)(b) and are not eligible for exemption.

In the present case, the Court found that although some objects are religious and relate to the Dawoodi Bohra community, the charitable objects (such as providing food and education) are not restricted to the community and serve the public at large. Therefore, the trust does not fall within the prohibition of Section 13(1)(b).

Issue 3: Interference with Tribunal's Findings of Fact under Section 260-A

The High Court declined to interfere with the Tribunal's factual finding that the respondent-trust is a public religious trust. The Supreme Court clarified the distinction between questions of fact and questions of law. While findings of fact by the last fact-finding authority are generally final, appellate courts must examine whether the issue involves the legal effect of the proven facts, which is a question of law.

The Court cited authoritative precedents including Wali Mohammad v. Mohammad Baksh, Sree Meenakshi Mills Ltd. v. CIT, and Dnyaneshwar Ranganath Bhandare v. Sadhu Dadu Shettigar, emphasizing that the legal effect of facts is a question of law and subject to appellate scrutiny.

Accordingly, the Court held that the classification of the trust based on its objects is a question of law requiring examination, and the High Court erred in refusing to consider the legal effect of the objects.

Issue 4: Interpretation of Relevant Provisions of the Income Tax Act

The Court analyzed the interplay of Sections 11, 12, 12A, 12AA, and 13. Sections 11 and 12 provide substantive exemptions for income derived from property held for charitable or religious purposes and from voluntary contributions. Sections 12A and 12AA prescribe procedural requirements for registration to claim exemption.

Section 13 enumerates circumstances where exemption is denied, including Section 13(1)(b) which denies exemption to charitable trusts benefiting particular religious communities or castes.

The Court emphasized that registration under Sections 12A and 12AA is a condition precedent for claiming exemption under Sections 11 and 12. The eligibility for exemption must be tested by reading Sections 11 and 12 in conjunction with Section 13.

Applying these provisions to the facts, the Court concluded that the respondent-trust, being a composite religious and charitable trust not restricted to a particular community for its charitable objects, is eligible for exemption under Section 11.

Competing arguments were addressed as follows: The Revenue contended that the trust's objects are not wholly religious but charitable and confined to the Dawoodi Bohra community, thus attracting Section 13(1)(b) and denying exemption. The respondent argued that the trust is a public religious trust and not subject to Section 13(1)(b). The Court rejected the Revenue's narrow view of the trust's objects and held that the charitable activities benefit the public at large and are not confined to the community, thus not falling under Section 13(1)(b).

Conclusions:

- The respondent-trust is a composite trust with both charitable and religious purposes.

- The charitable objects of the trust benefit the public at large and are not restricted to the Dawoodi Bohra community.

- Section 13(1)(b) applies only to charitable trusts benefiting a particular religious community or caste and does not exclude composite trusts whose charitable objects benefit the public.

- The findings of fact by the Tribunal regarding the nature of the trust involve legal effect and are subject to appellate scrutiny.

- The respondent-trust is eligible for registration under Sections 12A and 12AA and exemption under Section 11 of the Income Tax Act.

Significant holdings include the following verbatim excerpts:

"The proper legal effect of a proved fact is essentially a question of law... It is only the objects of a trust as declared in the trust deed which would govern its right of exemption under Section 11 or 12."

"The objects of the trust exhibit the dual tenor of religious and charitable purposes and activities... Section 11 of the Act shelters such trust with composite objects to claim exemption from tax as a religious and charitable trust subject to provisions of Section 13."

"Section 13(1)(b) applies to trusts established for charitable purposes for the benefit of any particular religious community or caste. Such trusts with composite objects would not be expelled out of the purview of Section 13(1)(b) per se. The section requires it to be examined whether such charitable purpose benefits a particular religious community or class or serves across the communities and for society at large."

"The objects... do not channel the benefits to any community if not the Dawoodi Bohra Community and thus, would not fall under the provisions of Section 13(1)(b) of the Act."

In final determination, the Court dismissed the appeals filed by the Revenue, holding that the respondent-trust is entitled to claim exemption under Section 11 of the Income Tax Act, being a public charitable and religious trust not restricted to a particular religious community for its charitable purposes.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates