Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + AT Income Tax - 2014 (7) TMI AT This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2014 (7) TMI 259 - AT - Income TaxAmount debited to P&L A/c as overdue interest reserve Held that:- The assesee had rightly contended that the assessee followed the regular system of accounting - the assessee has made the provision following the RBI guidelines - the assessee referred to the Master Circular of RBI for Income Recognition, Asset classification, provisioning and other related matter of the RBI - similar provision for overdue interest reserve has been made by the assessee in the prior period on the basis of RBI guidelines issued in this regard and the same was allowed - provisions made as per RBI guidelines are allowable - similar provision made in the previous period has been allowed to the assessee - the assessee has a reasonable case and the orders of the authorities is to be set aside Decided in favour of Assessee. Payment of internal tax auditor Liability to pay TDS on salary or u/s 194J as professional fee Held that:- CIT(A) rightly held that the payments to those persons did not attract liability of TDS u/s 194J of the Act - the payment is related to the salary payment there is no question of deduction of TDS u/s 194J of the Act thus, there was no infirmity in the order of the CIT(A) Decided against Revenue. Non-deduction of TDS Form 15G not obtained - Held that:- CIT(A) noted that several Form-15G were received by the assessee and they were sent to the CITs office under Certificate of posting - CIT(A) noted that as per the sub-rule(3) of Rule 29C of IT Rules the form 15G is forwarded to the Chief Commissioner or the Commissioner of Income Tax - CIT(A) held that the assessee complied its obligation and therefore the AO was not correct to disallow and add back to the income u/s 40(a)(ia) of the IT Act - CIT(A) has deleted the addition in this regard by finding that Form15G were obtained and sent to the Chief Commissioner of Income Tax in this regard thus, there was no infirmity in the order of the CIT(A) Decided against Revenue.
|