9911796707
|
Home
Issues Involved:
The judgment addresses the issue of whether a co-operative society is entitled to claim exemption under section 80P(2)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, with regard to income from letting out a portion of a building owned by the society. Summary: The co-operative society, engaged in banking activities, constructed a building to house its bank and administrative offices, with surplus space being let out. The society claimed a deduction of Rs. 20,000 for each assessment year under section 80P(2)(c) for the income from property. The Income-tax Officer initially denied further exemption under clause (c) as the society was already exempt under clause (a) for banking activities. The Appellate Assistant Commissioner allowed the deduction under clause (c) in addition to clauses (a) and (b). However, the Appellate Tribunal ruled that the society was not entitled to exemption under clause (c) as the income from letting out property did not qualify as profits and gains under that clause. The Tribunal also rejected the society's argument that letting out space should be considered a business activity under clause (a) of section 80P. Section 80P(2)(c) allows a deduction for co-operative societies engaged in activities other than those specified in clauses (a) or (b). The judgment clarifies that the exemption under clause (c) is supplementary to the exemptions under clauses (a) and (b), with specific limits on profits and gains attributable to activities outside of clause (a). To qualify for exemption under clause (c), the society must demonstrate a direct connection between the activity generating income and the profits or gains claimed for exemption. The judgment emphasizes that income "attributable to" an activity is broader than income "derived from," covering receipts beyond the direct conduct of the society's business. It distinguishes between income from activities related to the society's core operations, like supplying sugarcane, and income from property rental, which does not directly stem from the society's operational activities. The ruling concludes that letting out surplus space does not fall under the activity criteria of clause (c) for exemption, affirming the Tribunal's decision against the society's claim. In conclusion, the High Court answered the question in favor of the Revenue and against the co-operative society. The judgment will be communicated to the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Cochin Bench for further action.
|
