Case Laws
Acts
Notifications
Circulars
Classification
Forms
Manuals
Articles
News
D. Forum
Highlights
Notes
🚨 Important Update for Our Users
We are transitioning to our new and improved portal - www.taxtmi.com - for a better experience.
⚠️ This portal will be fully migrated on 31-July-2025 at 23:59:59
After this date, all services will be available exclusively on our new platform.
If you encounter any issues or problems while using the new portal,
please let us know
via our feedback form
, with specific details, so we can address them promptly.
Home
2015 (8) TMI 625 - SCH - CustomsExemption benefit of Notification No. 64/88-Cus. - Demand Confiscation and Penalty - Tribunal vide impugned order 2003 (10) TMI 153 - CESTAT MUMBAI set aside order of Commissioner denying benefit of Notification No. 64/88-Cus. as well as ordering confiscation of imported goods and instead remanded matter back to commissioner for re-consideration - Supreme court held that tribunal had only remanded matter back to Commissioner for fresh adjudication - In said circumstances no interference was called for.
The Supreme Court dismissed an appeal where the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal remanded the matter back to the Commissioner for fresh adjudication. No interference was deemed necessary.
|