Case Laws
Acts
Notifications
Circulars
Classification
Forms
Manuals
Articles
News
D. Forum
Highlights
Notes
🚨 Important Update for Our Users
We are transitioning to our new and improved portal - www.taxtmi.com - for a better experience.
Home
The High Court of Madhya Pradesh was asked to provide an opinion on whether the order of the Inspecting Assistant Commissioner imposing a penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act was valid. The case involved undisclosed income sources leading to a penalty of Rs. 30,000 imposed by the Inspecting Assistant Commissioner. The Tribunal upheld a penalty of Rs. 6,000, which was appealed by the assessee. The Tribunal was directed to provide a supplementary statement regarding the date of the penalty referral for further consideration.
|