Case Laws
Acts
Notifications
Circulars
Classification
Forms
Manuals
Articles
News
D. Forum
Highlights
Notes
🚨 Important Update for Our Users
We are transitioning to our new and improved portal - www.taxtmi.com - for a better experience.
⚠️ This portal will be fully migrated on 31-July-2025 at 23:59:59
After this date, all services will be available exclusively on our new platform.
If you encounter any issues or problems while using the new portal,
please let us know
via our feedback form
, with specific details, so we can address them promptly.
Home
The appellant was convicted under Section 25(1)(a) of the Arms Act for possessing unlicensed cartridges. The High Court upheld the two-year sentence but the Supreme Court reduced it to one year due to lack of admissible evidence connecting the appellant to dacoits. The appeal was dismissed, and the appellant was ordered to surrender to serve the reduced sentence.
|