Case Laws
Acts
Notifications
Circulars
Classification
Forms
Manuals
Articles
News
D. Forum
Highlights
Notes
🚨 Important Update for Our Users
We are transitioning to our new and improved portal - www.taxtmi.com - for a better experience.
Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2018 (1) TMI 1421 - HC - Income TaxDisallowance u/s 14A - whether the explanation of the assessee and the amount offered to tax under Section 14A could not have been rejected by the AO in the manner that he did? - Held that - Besides the fact that the findings are concurrent the Court is of the opinion that the facts of this case are such that no interference is called for. As against the exempt income of Rs. 48, 447/- the assessee had itself offered Rs. 2, 58, 620/- as disallowance. AO however disallowed the astronomically high figure of Rs. 3, 57, 82, 473/-. The concurrent view of the lower appellate authorities based upon the settled principle enunciated in previous authorities cannot be faulted. The appeal is accordingly dismissed.
The High Court upheld the decision of the ITAT and the CIT (A) regarding disallowance under Section 14A. The Assessing Officer's rejection of the assessee's explanation and offered amount was deemed inappropriate. The appeal was dismissed as the facts supported the lower authorities' decision based on settled principles.
|