TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + AT Income Tax - 2018 (8) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2018 (8) TMI 1855 - AT - Income Tax


Issues Involved:
1. Deletion of addition made by the Assessing Officer under Section 14A.
2. Distinction between exempt income under Section 10 and deductions under Chapter VI-A.
3. Application of Section 14A in cases of income eligible for deduction under Section 80P(2)(d).

Detailed Analysis:

1. Deletion of Addition Made by the Assessing Officer Under Section 14A:

The Revenue challenged the deletion of an addition of Rs. 2,04,008,629 made by the AO under Section 14A. The AO argued that the assessee had claimed deductions under Section 80P(2)(d) for interest and dividend income without incurring any expenditure to earn such income. The AO applied Section 14A read with Rule 8D, asserting that the income should not be included in the total income.

The CIT(A) observed that there is a distinction between exempt income under Section 10 and deductions under Chapter VI-A. The CIT(A) noted that the interest and dividend income were already part of the gross total income and not claimed as exempt. Thus, Rule 8D read with Section 14A was not applicable. The CIT(A) relied on previous judgments and concluded that there was no lawful ground to apply Section 14A in this case.

2. Distinction Between Exempt Income Under Section 10 and Deductions Under Chapter VI-A:

The CIT(A) emphasized the distinction between exempt income under Section 10 and deductions under Chapter VI-A. The AO failed to understand this distinction and wrongly applied Section 14A. The interest and dividend income from investments with other co-operative societies were credited as income in the profit and loss account, forming part of the gross total income. The CIT(A) held that Section 14A was not applicable as the income was not exempt but eligible for deduction under Section 80P(2)(d).

3. Application of Section 14A in Cases of Income Eligible for Deduction Under Section 80P(2)(d):

The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, noting that the issue was covered by previous Tribunal decisions in the assessee's favor. The Tribunal cited the case of CIT vs. Kribhco, where it was held that no disallowance can be made under Section 14A for income eligible for deduction under Section 80P. The Tribunal also referenced other judgments supporting the non-applicability of Section 14A in such cases.

The Tribunal concluded that the AO had erroneously applied Section 14A, and the CIT(A) correctly deleted the addition. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal for both assessment years 2009-10 and 2010-11 and allowed the assessee's appeal for the assessment year 2010-11, confirming that no disallowance under Section 14A should be made for income eligible for deduction under Section 80P(2)(d).

Conclusion:

The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision to delete the addition made by the AO under Section 14A, emphasizing the distinction between exempt income and deductions under Chapter VI-A. The Tribunal confirmed that Section 14A was not applicable to income eligible for deduction under Section 80P(2)(d), dismissing the Revenue's appeals and allowing the assessee's appeal.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates