Case Laws
Acts
Notifications
Circulars
Classification
Forms
Manuals
Articles
News
D. Forum
Highlights
Notes
🚨 Important Update for Our Users
We are transitioning to our new and improved portal - www.taxtmi.com - for a better experience.
⚠️ This portal will be discontinued on 31-07-2025
If you encounter any issues or problems while using the new portal,
please
let us know via our feedback form
so we can address them promptly.
Home
Issues involved: Cross appeals filed by Revenue and assessee against orders of Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals) regarding admission of additional evidence without confronting Assessing Officer.
Summary: The Appellate Tribunal ITAT Chennai considered cross appeals filed by the Revenue and the assessee against the orders of the Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals). The Revenue contended that the Commissioner violated Rule-46A of the Income Tax Rules, 1962 by admitting additional evidence without confronting it to the Assessing Officer. The Revenue requested the matters to be sent back to the Assessing Officer for re-adjudication after considering the additional evidence. The assessee, while having received partial relief from the Commissioner, agreed to the matters being restored back to the Assessing Officer for re-adjudication. The Tribunal, after considering the submissions and materials on record, agreed with the Revenue's contention and set aside the orders of the Commissioner in all the appeals, directing the matters to be restored back to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration on all issues. Consequently, all appeals filed by both the Revenue and the assessee were allowed for statistical purposes. The order was pronounced in the presence of the parties on 05/05/2011.
|