Case Laws
Acts
Notifications
Circulars
Classification
Forms
Manuals
Articles
News
D. Forum
Highlights
Notes
🚨 Important Update for Our Users
We are transitioning to our new and improved portal - www.taxtmi.com - for a better experience.
Home
The High Court of Madras declined to set aside a decree passed ex parte under Order IX, rule 13 of the Civil Procedure Code. The petitioner was not personally served, and the service relied on was on a person alleged to be his gumastah. The lower Court erred in assuming service on a gumastah was sufficient without further inquiry. The order was set aside, and the lower Court was directed to re-admit the petitioner's petition for full inquiry. Costs will be costs in the cause.
|