Case Laws
Acts
Notifications
Circulars
Classification
Forms
Manuals
Articles
News
D. Forum
Highlights
Notes
🚨 Important Update for Our Users
We are transitioning to our new and improved portal - www.taxtmi.com - for a better experience.
Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2016 (12) TMI 1818 - HC - Central ExciseRefund claim - the Assistant Commissioner of Central Excise is personally present in court and he submits that under the refund order(s) passed by the him due relief is granted to the manufacturer in pursuant to the direction given by the Commissioner Custom and Central Excise (Appeals) on 24.11.2014 and 25.03.2015 respectively - HELD THAT - After noticing the facts from the Court s order recorded on 24.11.2016 we find that the departmental authorizes has now discharged the responsibility under Section 11(BB) of the Central Excise Act. Thus we order closure of the cases by ordering that the 02.12.2016 refund order be placed in the records of the concerned case.
The High Court of Gauhati ordered closure of a case involving delayed refund interest granted to M/S Pan Parag India Limited by the Central Excise Department. The refund orders were passed in compliance with previous court orders and directives from the Commissioner, Custom and Central Excise. The department has fulfilled its responsibility under Section 11(BB) of the Central Excise Act.
|