Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + AT Income Tax - 2018 (7) TMI AT This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2018 (7) TMI 2122 - AT - Income TaxIncome accrued in India - interest income earned from investments in debt securities made in accordance with the SEBI Regulations - India-Mauritius Tax Treaty - whether assessee was indeed the ‘beneficial owner’ of the interest income in question? - whether such Tax Residency Certificate enables an inference that the interest income in question is beneficially owned by the assessee? - HELD THAT:- Ostensibly, as per the clarification issued by the CBDT, wherever a Certificate of Residency is issued by the Mauritian authority, such Certificate will constitute sufficient evidence for accepting the status of residence as well as the beneficial ownership for applying the provisions of the India-Mauritius Tax Treaty. Thus,aforesaid clarification by the CBDT supports the assertion of the assessee that based on the Certificate of Tax Residency issued by the Mauritian authority there is sufficient evidence to accept the position that the ‘beneficial ownership’ of the impugned interest income is with the assessee. CBDT Circular no. 789 dated 13.04.2000 is specifically in the context of incomes by way of dividend and capital gain on sale of shares. It would equally apply even in the situation before us where the application of the provisions of the India-Mauritius Tax Treaty is sought to be applied for considering the taxability of interest income as per Article 11(3)(c) of the India-Mauritius Tax Treaty. Drawing strength from the judgment of Universal International Music B.V [2013 (4) TMI 641 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT] as relating to the taxability of Royalty income in the context of India-Netherlands Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement. In the said decision also, CBDT Circular no. 789 dated 13.04.2000 (supra) was held applicable in the context of Royalty income - even in the context of the impugned interest income, Circular no. 789 dated 13.04.2000 of the CBDT is applicable while applying the provisions of Article 11(3)(c) of the India-Mauritius Tax Treaty - we uphold the plea of the assessee that assessee is the ‘beneficial owner’ of the impugned interest income on the strength of the Tax Residency Certificate issued by the Mauritian authorities. Element of interest income earned by the assessee from Hyundai Motor India Ltd., the Chennai Bench of the Tribunal in its decision in the case of Hyundai Motor India Ltd. [2017 (4) TMI 1193 - ITAT CHENNAI] has already observed that the recipient therein (i.e. the assessee before us), was the ‘beneficial owner’ of the interest income qua the provisions of Article 11 of the India-Mauritius Tax Treaty. Be that as it may, in view of our aforesaid discussion, we uphold the stand of the assessee that it is the ‘beneficial owner’ of the interest income qua the provisions of Article 11(3)(c) of the India-Mauritius Tax Treaty and thus, such income is not taxable in India. - Decided in favour of assessee.
|