Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + HC Income Tax - 2019 (6) TMI HC This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2019 (6) TMI 1514 - HC - Income TaxExemption u/s 10A - total turnover for the purpose of Section 10A - Tribunal held that the expenditure incurred in foreign exchange which have even specifically excluded from export turnover by explanation 2(iv) to Section 10A would also not form part of the total turnover for the purpose of Section 10A - HELD THAT:- Issue covered against the Revenue in the light of the decision of HCL Technologies Ltd. [2018 (5) TMI 357 - SUPREME COURT]. Accordingly, substantial question of law decided against the Revenue. Entitlement of deduction u/s 10A - Nodistinguish between STPI and non-STPI as the employees with both the units are same, the products and services are also same and the infrastructure is also similar - HELD THAT:- CIT(A) after going through the entire factual matrix, held that the assessee has furnished sufficient material to show that there is a separate and distinct STPI formed which has engaged itself in export and development of software involving substantial investment in infrastructure including computers and software and employees and the Assessing Officer's conclusion that there is a splitting up of the existing unit is not correct and such finding has been given without analysing and appreciating all the relevant facts. CIT(A) proceeds to elaborately take note of the factual position, the profit and loss account, the amount of expenditure incurred etc., and record the factual finding that there is no splitting up of existing business and the assessee has fulfilled the relevant conditions under Section 10A Tribunal once again does a fact finding exercise and concludes that the case that same machinery as that of the old unit were used by the STPI is only based upon suspicion and not tenable as the assessee has acquired total assets worth ₹ 1.43 Crores for the STPI Unit for the financial year 2000-01. This order passed by the Tribunal was followed for the assessment year 2002-03. Following fact finding exercise was done by CIT(A) by assigning independent reasons and thus, we find that there is no question of law much less substantial question of law arising for consideration in these appeals - Decided against revenue.
|