Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + HC Income Tax - 1932 (1) TMI HC This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
1932 (1) TMI 27 - HIGH COURT OF MADRASExtract: .......one. Upon whom the burden is ultimately to fall is a matter of arrangement between the vendor company and the purchaser company. Taking this view, in my opinion, our answer to the question referred must be that the new company is the successor of the petitioners. Costs to the Commissioner ₹ 250. Ramesam, J. 4. I agree. Cornish, J. 5. I agree.
|