Case Laws
Acts
Notifications
Circulars
Classification
Forms
Manuals
Articles
News
D. Forum
Highlights
Notes
🚨 Important Update for Our Users
We are transitioning to our new and improved portal - www.taxtmi.com - for a better experience.
Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2019 (8) TMI 1661 - AT - Income TaxMaintainability of appeal - low tax effect - HELD THAT - In this case as per the return of income filed by the assessee income declared was Rs. 2, 38, 10, 300/- and assessed income was Rs. 3, 22, 27, 430/- after making addition of Rs. 84, 17, 130/-. This addition has been deleted by ld. CIT(A) and against the same the appeal was filed by the revenue and the C.O. is filed by the assessee which is merely in support of the order of ld. CIT(A). As per the latest notification issued by CBDT no appeal is required to be filed by the revenue before the Tribunal if the tax effect is below Rs. 50 Lakhs and since in the present case the tax effect is below Rs. 50 Lakhs the appeal of the revenue is not maintainable because of low tax. This is by now a settled position of law that CBDT instruction is applicable to the pending appeals also and hence this appeal of the revenue is dismissed because of low tax effect. The C.O. filed by the assessee is in support of the order of ld. CIT(A) and since the appeal of the revenue is dismissed as not maintainable the C.O. is also not maintainable and dismissed accordingly.
Issues involved:
Appeal by revenue against order of CIT(A) for Assessment Year 2012-13, Deletion of addition by CIT(A), Maintainability of appeal by revenue due to low tax effect, Maintainability of Cross Objection (C.O.) by assessee. Analysis: 1. Deletion of Addition by CIT(A): - The appeal was filed by the revenue against the order of the ld. CIT(A) for Assessment Year 2012-13. The assessee had declared an income of Rs. 2,38,10,300, which was assessed at Rs. 3,22,27,430 after an addition of Rs. 84,17,130. However, the CIT(A) deleted this addition. Both sides were heard, and it was noted that the tax effect in this case was below Rs. 50 Lakhs. As per CBDT notification, no appeal is required to be filed by the revenue before the Tribunal if the tax effect is below Rs. 50 Lakhs. Therefore, the appeal of the revenue was dismissed by the Tribunal due to the low tax effect. The Cross Objection filed by the assessee was in support of the CIT(A)'s order. Since the appeal by the revenue was dismissed, the C.O. was also not maintainable and was dismissed accordingly. 2. Maintainability of Appeal by Revenue: - The Tribunal highlighted that CBDT instruction regarding the tax effect being below Rs. 50 Lakhs is applicable to pending appeals as well. Therefore, in this case, as the tax effect was below the specified threshold, the appeal filed by the revenue was considered not maintainable and was dismissed on this ground. 3. Maintainability of Cross Objection (C.O.) by Assessee: - The Cross Objection filed by the assessee was found to be merely in support of the order of the CIT(A). Since the appeal by the revenue was dismissed due to low tax effect, the C.O. was also considered not maintainable and dismissed accordingly. In conclusion, the Tribunal dismissed both the appeal filed by the revenue and the Cross Objection filed by the assessee due to the low tax effect, as per the CBDT notification. The decision was based on the settled position of law that the CBDT instruction applies to pending appeals as well. The order was pronounced in the open court on the mentioned date.
|