Case Laws
Acts
Notifications
Circulars
Classification
Forms
Manuals
Articles
News
D. Forum
Highlights
Notes
🚨 Important Update for Our Users
We are transitioning to our new and improved portal - www.taxtmi.com - for a better experience.
Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2019 (11) TMI 1635 - HC - CustomsPrayer for adjournment - preventive detention not served - petitioner/detenue had been in custody in Central Jail Visakhapatnam for a period of sixty days - HELD THAT - This Court finds it strange that despite the petitioner/detenue being in custody for sixty days the preventive detention order had not been served upon him. The Joint Secretary COFEPOSA Ministry of Finance is directed to file a personal affidavit explaining the lapse if any - List on 16th December 2019.
The High Court of Delhi directed the Joint Secretary, COFEPOSA, Ministry of Finance to file a personal affidavit explaining why the preventive detention order was not served on the petitioner/detenue despite being in custody for sixty days. Case to be listed on 16th December, 2019.
|