9911796707
Case Laws
Acts
Notifications
Circulars
Classification
Forms
Manuals
Articles
News
D. Forum
Highlights
Notes
🚨 Important Update for Our Users
We are transitioning to our new and improved portal - www.taxtmi.com - for a better experience.
⚠️ This portal will be fully migrated on 31-July-2025 at 23:59:59
After this date, all services will be available exclusively on our new platform.
If you encounter any issues or problems while using the new portal,
please let us know
via our feedback form
, with specific details, so we can address them promptly.
Follow us:
|
Home
Issues involved: Appeal by Revenue regarding depreciation on project assets at 10% rate applicable to 'building', and amortization of project cost.
Depreciation on project assets: Revenue contended that Tribunal's decision in assessee's previous case was not final due to pending appeal before High Court. However, Tribunal held that decision in previous case applied as facts remained the same. Assessing Officer disallowed depreciation on project assets, stating assessee was not owner and not eligible for depreciation. However, Tribunal directed to allow depreciation on road at building rate based on similar case precedent. Tribunal dismissed Revenue's appeal, citing lack of evidence of Tribunal's decision reversal by High Court. Amortization of project cost: As depreciation issue was decided in favor of appellant, this issue became irrelevant and was dismissed for statistical purposes. Conclusion: Tribunal upheld CIT(A)'s decision to allow depreciation on project assets at building rate, based on precedent, and dismissed Revenue's appeal.
|
