Case Laws
Acts
Notifications
Circulars
Classification
Forms
Manuals
Articles
News
D. Forum
Highlights
Notes
🚨 Important Update for Our Users
We are transitioning to our new and improved portal - www.taxtmi.com - for a better experience.
⚠️ This portal will be discontinued on 31-07-2025
If you encounter any issues or problems while using the new portal,
please
let us know via our feedback form
so we can address them promptly.
Home
2019 (1) TMI 1920 - HC - VAT and Sales TaxRequirement of issuance of notice - statutory requirement of a notice before imposing the liability to pay interest - Section 22(2) of Andhra Pradesh Value Added Tax Act 2005 - HELD THAT - The impugned order is under Section 22(2) of the A.P. VAT Act. Since interest is automatic the Statute does not stipulate any prior notice. But while framing Rules under the Act the Government had provided for an opportunity under Rule 24(4) of the A.P. VAT Rules 2005. Obviously the procedure prescribed by Rule 24(4) was not followed. In cases where a larger opportunity is given under the Rules the same also has to be followed in order to comply with the principles of natural justice - the writ petition is ordered directing the petitioner to treat the impugned demand itself as a show cause notice.
The High Court of Telangana ruled that the dealer under the Andhra Pradesh Value Added Tax Act, 2005, must be given a notice before imposing the liability to pay interest. The court directed the dealer to treat the demand as a show cause notice and file a reply by a specified date. The Assessing Officer may then pass fresh orders.
|