9911796707
|
Home
Issues involved: Appeal by Revenue against order of CIT(A) granting relief to assessee u/s 143(3) read with 147 for assessment years 2008-09 and 2009-10 respectively.
Assessment Year 2008-09: The Revenue appealed against CIT(A)'s decision to reduce assessee's income by &8377; 29,17,895, not originally claimed, but related to a prior assessment year. CIT(A) allowed the reduction as the income was doubly taxed previously. The Tribunal upheld CIT(A)'s decision, emphasizing that income cannot be taxed twice, and CIT(A) had verified the claim before allowing it. Revenue's argument that the claim did not arise from the assessment order or return of income was dismissed as irrelevant. The appeal was dismissed. Assessment Year 2009-10: Similar to the previous year, the Revenue challenged CIT(A)'s decision to reduce assessee's income by &8377; 62,19,510, not initially claimed, but previously taxed in a different assessment year. CIT(A) found the claim valid as the amount was part of the total assessed income in the prior year. The Tribunal, following the reasoning from the previous year, upheld CIT(A)'s decision, stating there was no substantive merit in the Revenue's appeal. Consequently, the appeal for the assessment year 2009-10 was also dismissed. In both cases, the Tribunal affirmed CIT(A)'s decisions to reduce the assessee's income based on claims related to prior assessment years, emphasizing the principle that income cannot be taxed twice. The Revenue's argument that the claims did not originate from the assessment order or return of income was deemed irrelevant as the correctness of the claims was verified by CIT(A) before granting relief.
|
