Home Case Index All Cases Indian Laws Indian Laws + HC Indian Laws - 2016 (1) TMI HC This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2016 (1) TMI 1478 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURTCompromise between the parties during the pendency of the appeal before this Court - compounding of offence - HELD THAT:- This Court in the case of SUBE SINGH AND ORS. VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. [2013 (4) TMI 983 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT] has considered the compounding of offences at the appellate stage and has observed that even when appeal against the conviction is pending before the Sessions Court and parties entered into a compromise, the High Court is vested unparallel power under Section 482 Cr.PC to quash criminal proceedings at any stage so as to secure the ends of justice. Similarly, in the case of BAGHEL SINGH VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB [2014 (5) TMI 1218 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT], whereby the accused was convicted under Section 326 IPC and was sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for two years, the parties entered into compromise during the pendency of the appeal. In view of the fact that the parties have entered into a compromise and learned Addl. Sessions Judge, Shaheed Bhagat Singh Nagar has submitted her report in support of genuineness of the compromise, the present petition is allowed.
|