Case Laws
Acts
Notifications
Circulars
Classification
Forms
Manuals
Articles
News
D. Forum
Highlights
Notes
🚨 Important Update for Our Users
We are transitioning to our new and improved portal - www.taxtmi.com - for a better experience.
⚠️ This portal will be discontinued on 31-07-2025
If you encounter any issues or problems while using the new portal,
please
let us know via our feedback form
so we can address them promptly.
Home
2018 (4) TMI 1917 - AT - Income TaxExemption u/s 11 - rejecting the application u/s 12 AA of the Income Tax Act 1961 on account of non attendance - assessee filed an application in Form-10A seeking registration u/s 12A - HELD THAT - As noted that the Trust has been found by the parent company to redeem its CSR obligations and the Settlers of the Trust were noted to be the Directors of the parent company. The CIT (E) sought details as set out in para 5 and 6 of the impugned order and in the absence of any effective representation the impugned order has been passed. Accordingly in the light of the submissions of the parties before the Bench accepting the oral undertaking of the ld. AR that the assessee shall not abuse the trust reposed the impugned order is set aside to the CIT (Exemptions) Chandigarh with the direction to pass a speaking order in accordance with law after giving the assessee a reasonable opportunity of being heard. The assessee is directed to participate fully and fairly before the said authority and not abuse the trust reposed. It is made clear that in the eventuality of abuse of the same the CIT(Exemptions) would be at liberty to pass an order on the basis of the material available on record. Appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.
Issues:
1. Correctness of the order u/s 12AA(1)(b)(ii) of the Act dated 24.08.2017 2. Rejection of application u/s 12 AA of the Income Tax Act 1961 3. Non-attendance due to final notice received on E-mail 4. Request for restoration of appeal for adjudication after hearing the assessee 5. Opportunity of being heard and remanding the matter back to the authority 6. Passing of order ex-parte 7. Seeking registration u/s 12A on 02.02.2017 8. Trust's Aims and Objects 9. Settlers of the Trust and their relationship with the parent company 10. Directions for passing a speaking order and giving a reasonable opportunity of being heard 11. Participation before the authority and not abusing the trust Analysis: 1. The appeal was filed challenging the correctness of the order u/s 12AA(1)(b)(ii) of the Act dated 24.08.2017. The appellant argued that the Commissioner of Income Tax Exemptions erred in rejecting the application u/s 12 AA due to non-attendance, which was attributed to a final notice received via E-mail that went unanswered. The Trust fulfilled all conditions for registration, and the appellant sought the grant of the same. 2. The appellant requested the restoration of the appeal for adjudication after hearing the assessee. The appellant's representative highlighted that the assessee had sought an adjournment on a previous hearing date, but subsequent notices were not received by the assessee due to not checking the E-mail. The appellant prayed for an opportunity to be heard and for the matter to be remanded back to the authority for compliance with necessary information. 3. The Senior DR had no objection if the assessee presented full facts and submissions before the CIT (Exemptions), acknowledging that the order had been passed ex-parte. 4. The Tribunal reviewed the material on record, noting that the Trust had applied for registration u/s 12A on 02.02.2017. The Trust's Aims and Objects, including fulfilling CSR obligations of the parent company, were considered. The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and directed the CIT (Exemptions) to pass a speaking order after giving the assessee a reasonable opportunity to be heard. The assessee was instructed to participate fully and fairly, with a warning against abusing the trust reposed. 5. The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee for statistical purposes, with the order pronounced in the Open Court on 20th April 2018.
|