1939 (8) TMI 35 - HC - Indian Laws

Summary

The plaintiff claimed ownership of a promissory note, but the trial court disbelieved the claim against the first defendant. The court held that since the plaintiff was not the payee or holder of the note, a decree could not be passed in the plaintiff's favor against the maker of the note. The court dismissed the Civil Revision Petition, upholding the trial court's decision.