9911796707
|
Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2020 (9) TMI 1278 - AAR - GSTSupply or not - service provided by the assessee to its members - applicability of principal of mutuality - assessee and its members are one and same or not - Central/ Jharkhand Goods and Services Tax Act 2017 - HELD THAT - The applicant is not a company which provides shareholding to its members rather its liabilities/debts are guaranteed by the members - Now once it has been established that the applicant is not doing any business in terms of section 2(17) of the CGST Act 2017 it can be deduced that activities carried out by the applicant would not come under the scope of supply as envisaged under section 7(1) of the CGST Act 2017. Principal of mutuality - HELD THAT - The applicant is giving service to its members but the club is formed on the principle of mutuality and therefore any transaction by the club to its member is not a transaction between two parties. However when the club is dealing with its members it is not a separate and distinct individual. Further we find that it is a mutuality which constitutes the club and therefore supply by a club to its member and its services rendered to the members is not a supply or service by club to the members. Thus the applicant is governed by the principal of mutuality - the applicant and its members are one and same.
Issues Involved:
1. Whether the service provided by the assessee to its members comes within the definition of 'Supply' under the Central/ Jharkhand Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. 2. Whether the assessee is governed by the principle of mutuality. 3. Whether the assessee and its members are one and the same. Issue-wise Detailed Analysis: 1. Definition of 'Supply': The primary issue is whether the services provided by the assessee to its members qualify as 'Supply' under Section 7 of the CGST Act, 2017. The definition of 'Supply' includes all forms of supply of goods or services made for a consideration by a person in the course or furtherance of business. The term 'business' under Section 2(17) includes the provision by a club of facilities or benefits to its members for a subscription or consideration. The applicant is a Not-for-Profit corporate entity, and its activities do not constitute business as defined under the CGST Act. Therefore, the services provided to its members do not fall under the scope of 'Supply' as envisaged under Section 7(1) of the CGST Act, 2017. 2. Principle of Mutuality: The applicant argued that the principle of mutuality applies to its operations. The club was established for non-profit motives, and its members do not have any right to any surplus generated by the club. The principle of mutuality implies that the club and its members are not distinct entities. This principle has been upheld by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in various cases, including the case of Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Ranchi Club Ltd. and Chief Commissioner of Central Excise and Service Tax vs. Ranchi Club Ltd. The principle of mutuality dictates that transactions between the club and its members are not transactions between two separate parties, thus not subject to GST. 3. Assessee and Its Members as One Entity: The assessee contends that it and its members are one and the same entity. This argument is supported by the principle of mutuality, which states that the club and its members are indistinguishable. The Hon'ble Supreme Court's judgments in the cases of Calcutta Club Ltd. and Ranchi Club Ltd. affirm that the club and its members are not separate entities for tax purposes. Therefore, the services provided by the club to its members do not constitute a 'Supply' under GST law. Ruling: 1. The service provided by the applicant to its members does not come within the definition of 'Supply' as envisaged under the Central/ Jharkhand Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. 2. The applicant is governed by the principle of mutuality. 3. The applicant and its members are one and the same. Note: The Finance Bill, 2021 amended Section 7 of the CGST Act, 2017, effective from July 1, 2017, to clarify that the club and its members are deemed to be two separate persons, making the supply of activities or transactions between them taxable. This amendment overrides any previous judgments or orders to the contrary.
|
