9911796707
|
Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2022 (12) TMI 1387 - AT - Income TaxFixed place PE/dependent agent PE - Existence or otherwise of a Permanent Establishment (PE) in India - attribution of profit to the PE - assessee is a non-resident corporate entity incorporated in Singapore - HELD THAT - As decided in own case 2022 (5) TMI 674 - ITAT DELHI issues arising for consideration are squarely covered by the decision of the Tribunal in assessee s own case in assessment year 2017-18 respectfully following the same we hold that the assessee had no PE in India. Decided in favour of assessee.
Issues involved:
1. Existence of Permanent Establishment (PE) in India 2. Attribution of profit to the PE Analysis: 1. The appeals by the assessee were against final assessment orders under the Income Tax Act, 1961 for assessment years 2018-19 and 2019-20, based on directions from the Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP). The main issues raised were regarding the existence of a Permanent Establishment (PE) in India and the attribution of profit to the PE. The assessee, a non-resident corporate entity from Singapore engaged in the business of scientific research instruments, had earned revenue from sales and services in India. The Assessing Officer had previously held that the assessee had a fixed place PE and dependent agent PE in India, leading to taxation of income in India. However, the assessee contended that a previous Tribunal decision in a similar case held that there was no PE in India. 2. The Tribunal, after considering the facts and materials, found that the issues were identical to those in a previous assessment year. In a prior decision, the Tribunal had ruled that the assessee had no PE in India and that no further profit could be attributed to the PE if transactions were at arm's length. The Tribunal upheld the assessee's position and directed the Assessing Officer to delete the additions. Despite the DRP's decision to follow its previous ruling, the Tribunal emphasized that the issues were already settled in the assessee's favor based on the earlier Tribunal decision. Therefore, the Tribunal concluded that the assessee had no PE in India, and its business profit was not taxable in India. As a result, the appeals were allowed, and the additions were directed to be deleted.
|
