Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + HC Income Tax - 2012 (2) TMI HC This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2012 (2) TMI 733 - DELHI HIGH COURTComputation of capital gains on the sale of a capital asset - description of the previous owner and the period of holding of the asset by the assessee - Benefit of indexed cost of inflation - determination of indexed cost of acquisition - HELD THAT:- As decided by ARUN SHUNGLOO TRUST VERSUS CIT [2012 (2) TMI 259 - DELHI HIGH COURT] expression “held by the assessee” used in Explanation (iii) to Section 48 has to be understood in the context and harmoniously with other Sections. The cost of acquisition stipulated in Section 49 means the cost for which the previous owner had acquired the property. The term “held by the assessee” should be interpreted to include the period during which the property was held by the previous owner. CIT v. Manjula J.Shah [2011 (10) TMI 406 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT] – Decided against the Revenue.
|