Home Case Index All Cases Service Tax Service Tax + AT Service Tax - 2008 (9) TMI AT This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2008 (9) TMI 42 - CESTAT AHMEDABADCommissioner (Appeals) has dismissed the appeal for non-compliance with the directions contained in his stay order, - pre-deposit of tax amount which is almost 90%, along with 100% interest amount, should have been considered sufficient by Commissioner (Appeals) for the purposes of Section 35F and should have disposed off the appeal on merit instead of dismissing appeal for non-compliance - impugned order is set aside and matter is remanded to Commissioner (Appeals) for decision on merit
|