Case Laws
Acts
Notifications
Circulars
Classification
Forms
Manuals
Articles
News
D. Forum
Highlights
Notes
🚨 Important Update for Our Users
We are transitioning to our new and improved portal - www.taxtmi.com - for a better experience.
⚠️ This portal will be discontinued on 31-07-2025
If you encounter any issues or problems while using the new portal,
please
let us know via our feedback form
so we can address them promptly.
Home
2019 (9) TMI 1729 - AT - Income TaxEstimation of income - bogus purchases - purchases were treated as non-genuine purchases and an estimated addition of 12.5% was made against the stated purchases - FAA restricted the additions to 6% - HELD THAT - We find that the estimated addition of 6% is in accordance with the decision of this Tribunal in the case of assessee s sister concern for AY 2011-12. Nothing on record would suggest any change in material facts. Therefore finding no infirmity in the impugned order we dismiss both the appeals.
Issues involved: Cross-appeals for Assessment Year 2010-11 contesting the estimation of addition on account of alleged bogus purchases.
Summary: The Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai heard cross-appeals for Assessment Year 2010-11 regarding the estimation of addition on account of alleged bogus purchases. The assessee, a resident firm engaged in trading of chemical & pharmaceutical items, was assessed under section 143(3) read with section 147. The income was determined at Rs.10.26 Lacs after an addition of alleged bogus purchases amounting to Rs.10.13 Lacs. Re-assessment proceedings were initiated under section 147 based on information from the investigation wing/Sales tax Department, revealing alleged bogus purchases of Rs.81.07 Lacs. Despite notices issued to parties and the assessee's defense, the purchases were treated as non-genuine, leading to an estimated addition of 12.5%. The first appellate authority restricted the addition to 6% based on a Tribunal decision for AY 2011-12, resulting in the cross-appeals. The Tribunal found the 6% estimated addition to be in line with a previous decision for the assessee's sister concern for AY 2011-12, with no change in material facts. Consequently, both appeals were dismissed, and the order was pronounced on 11th September 2019.
|