2006 (7) TMI 108 - HC - Income Tax

Assessing officer refused to accept the original return showing loss & after issuing notice completed assessment u/s 148 resulting in profit Held that special deduction u/s 80HHC on export profits can t be denied for technical defect of non-furnishing of audit report with original return.

Summary

Issues Involved:
1. Disallowance of interest paid on borrowed funds diverted to sister concerns.
2. Claim of deduction under Section 80HHC without filing Form 10CCAC along with the return.

Issue-Wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Disallowance of Interest Paid on Borrowed Funds Diverted to Sister Concerns:

The assessee filed its return for the assessment year 1993-94, claiming a loss. The assessment was initially completed without disallowing the interest paid on borrowed funds diverted to sister concerns. The Revenue later issued a notice under Section 148 of the Income-tax Act, leading to a reassessment under Section 147, which resulted in profit. The Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) accepted the assessee's case and deleted the addition of notional interest on borrowed funds diverted to sister concerns. However, the Tribunal allowed the Revenue's appeal on this issue and remanded the matter back to the assessing officer for fresh consideration. The Revenue did not raise any grievance regarding this remittance.

2. Claim of Deduction Under Section 80HHC Without Filing Form 10CCAC Along with the Return:

The assessee sought to claim a deduction under Section 80HHC based on an audit report by filing Form 10CCAC, which was not initially filed with the return. The Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) rejected this claim, stating that the form was not filed along with the return or during the assessment proceedings. The Tribunal, however, allowed the assessee's appeal and directed the assessing officer to re-examine the issue after considering the Form 10CCAC filed by the assessee. The Revenue objected to this remittance, arguing that the failure to file the audit report along with the return barred the assessee from claiming the deduction under Section 80HHC.

The court examined the provisions of sub-sections (5) and (9) of Section 139 of the Income-tax Act, which allow for the rectification of defects in the return. It was noted that the assessing officer should have informed the assessee about the defect of not filing Form 10CCAC when the assessment was recomputed to show a profit. The court referenced several judgments, including CIT v. Rai Bahadur Bissesswarlal Motilal Malwasie Trust and Murali Export House v. CIT, which held that the filing of the audit report along with the return is directory and not mandatory. The court emphasized that the assessee should be given a fair opportunity to rectify omissions and claim deductions.

The court concluded that the spirit behind the relevant provisions is to allow the assessee a reasonable opportunity to claim benefits under the statute. Denying the deduction on technical grounds was deemed unjustified, especially when the assessee initially showed a loss and later, a profit after reassessment. The court confirmed the Tribunal's order to remit the matter to the assessing officer for fresh consideration regarding the claim under Section 80HHC.

Conclusion:

The court dismissed the appeal, confirming the Tribunal's decision to remand the matter for fresh consideration of the assessee's claim for deduction under Section 80HHC by filing Form 10CCAC. No substantial question of law was found to arise from the appeal.