Case Laws
Acts
Notifications
Circulars
Classification
Forms
Manuals
Articles
News
D. Forum
Highlights
Notes
🚨 Important Update for Our Users
We are transitioning to our new and improved portal - www.taxtmi.com - for a better experience.
Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2017 (5) TMI 84 - SCH - Central ExciseInterim stay of order passed by High Court - omitting the delayed payments of duty through CENVAT - Rule 8(3A) - decision in the case of Commissioner of Central Excise Delhi Versus Vikrant Auto Industries 2016 (9) TMI 322 - DELHI HIGH COURT contested where it was held that Rule 8 (3A) itself has been struck down and is no longer in existence - Held that - There shall be interim stay of the impugned judgment and order passed by the High Court of Delhi 2016 (9) TMI 322 - DELHI HIGH COURT - petition disposed off.
The Supreme Court condoned delay, issued notice, and granted interim stay on the judgment and order passed by the High Court of Delhi in CEAC No.4 of 2016 and Review Petition no.441 of 2016.
|