Home Case Index All Cases Service Tax Service Tax + AT Service Tax - 2009 (6) TMI AT This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2009 (6) TMI 70 - CESTAT, MUMBAIAppeal against the order of Commissioner (appeals) – held that - Merely because the representative of the appellant has chosen to have the hearing of the matter beyond a particular date that is not binding on the Tribunal. Hence the grievance disclosed in the letter of the representative of the appellant is devoid of any substance and on that ground the matter cannot be adjourned any further. - it is necessary for the party to make necessary arrangements either to appear in person or through its representative on appointed date - The order passed by the original authority as well as the impugned order apparently disclose that the activities carried out by the appellant comprises of all the essential functions which are normally performed by Clearing and Forwarding Agents. Being so, we do not find any prima facie case as such for grant of stay of the impugned order
|