Home Case Index All Cases Customs Customs + AT Customs - 2018 (2) TMI AT This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2018 (2) TMI 657 - AT - CustomsMisdeclaration - Import of restricted item - Copper Wire Scrap with PVC sheathing of Druid grade - main contention of the department is that the imported goods have been misdeclared as copper scrap, lead scrap and insulated material whereas they are actually Copper Wire Scrap with PVC sheathing of Druid grade" which can be imported without a license only by the units registered with the Ministry of Environment and Forests but the importer herein does not possess such license. Held that: - While the imported goods were in fact copper wire scrap only, even as per the commercial invoice, pre-shipment inspection certificate etc. and Form-9 submitted under Rule 16 (5) of the Hazardous Wastes Rules, the declaration of the goods in the Bill of Entry as copper waste scrap, lead scrap and insulation material separately has not helped their case with the department. Very possibly, the appellant had made such a declaration taking into account that the percentage of copper in the imported goods was 41%, lead 37% and plastic and ferrous 22% as per the transboundary movement documents and load port certificate. When the goods are allowed for re-export, there should not be any redemption fine because redemption fine is for enjoyment of the goods in the manner of home consumption even when a law is violated. Redemption fine in a way redeems the violation committed by the importer and paves the way for unencumbered enjoyment of the imported goods thereafter. However, this is not a case where the goods have been cleared for home consumption - redemption fine is an overkill and is to be set aside. Penalty u/s 112 (a) of the CA 1962 - Held that: - Lalkamal, the High sea buyer, M/s.Sterling Steels, the original importer will surely require a rap on the knuckles at least for the wrong declaration in the Bill of Entry. However, the penalties imposed on these persons under Section 112 (a) of the Customs Act, 1962 of ₹ 2 lakhs each is excessive and interest of justice would be served by reducing the penalties on them to ₹ 1,00,000/- (Rupees one lakh only). Penalty on Vimal Kumar, Asif Rehman, proprietors of Sri Lalkamal Enterprises and Sterling Steels respectively - Held that: - penalties cannot be sustained since they are proprietors - it is settled law that both proprietor and the proprietaryship firm cannot be penalized in such matters. Hence penalties imposed on these persons are set aside. Appellant Shri Abdul Saleem has been indicated as friend of Shri Asif Rehman, Proprietor of Sterling Steel who had allegedly arranged import consignment from Qatar - the said appellant was only in the nature of a broker or agent who brought sellers and buyers together and it would be unfair to penalize him. The penalty imposed on him is also therefore set aside. Appeal allowed in part.
|