Home Case Index All Cases Companies Law Companies Law + AT Companies Law - 2019 (1) TMI AT This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2019 (1) TMI 194 - AT - Companies LawTyping error in the operative order - Validity of allotment of shares - petitioner claims that deposits made by him to the extent of ₹ 1.54 crores in the account of Respondent No.1 Company was in the nature of loan paid to save mortgaged properties and not for allotment of shares as was done by the Company - Held that:- There is typing error in Operative Order (Para – 17) in direction – 3 which is apparent on the face of record. Although we are proceeding to dismiss the Appeal and also propose to saddle the Appellant with costs, we are also correcting direction – 3 of the operative Order regarding the typing error in operative order of para – 17 of the Impugned Order under Rule 11 of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Rules, 2016 to meet the ends of Justice. In the Impugned Order para – 17(3) at both places where it is mentioned “Rs.1,50,00,000/-” read “Rs.1,54,00,000/-”. The Impugned Order is approved with this correction of typing error. The Appeal is dismissed with costs. The Appellant will pay ₹ 1,50,000/- as costs to Respondent No.1 – LVN Muralidhar. Other Respondents to bear their own costs.
|