Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 2019 (4) TMI AT This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2019 (4) TMI 895 - CESTAT MUMBAIRectification of mistake/restoration of appeal - Held that:- The averment in the Misc. Application found to be mis-leading and incorrect inasmuch as the Revenue has filed two appeals as required under Rule 6A of CESTAT (Procedure) Rules, 1982 on the same day i.e. 01.08.2016 for the amounts ₹ 14,28,748/- and ₹ 50,49,547/- as the impugned order-in-appeal disposed two orders-in-original. The appeals are allocated different numbers viz. E/86987/2016 and E/86988/2016. Therefore, the present Misc. Application filed by the Revenue is infructuous. We are also constrained to mention that this Bench has been constituted specifically at 1430 hrs. to-day by the Hon’ble President, since the Members are assigned to different Benches, only for the purpose of disposal of ROM applications filed. This sort of frivolous application consumes the time of the Tribunal and retards the pace of disposal of appeals pending before the Tribunal. ROM/ROA is dismissed being infructuous.
|