1974 (2) TMI 22 - HC - Income Tax

Summary

Issues:
Interpretation of section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 regarding rebate under section 84 for partners of a firm.
Applicability of section 154 of the Income-tax Act for rectifying a mistake apparent on the face of the record.
Claiming rebate under section 84 in the income tax return.

Analysis:

The judgment of the High Court of ALLAHABAD dealt with a case where the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal referred a question of law regarding the allowance of rebate under section 84 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 to the partners of a firm. The issue revolved around whether the Tribunal was correct in holding that section 154 of the Act did not apply to grant rebate to the partners of the firm where relief had already been allowed to the firm under section 84.

The assessee, a partner in the firm, had not claimed rebate under section 84 in the income tax return. The Income-tax Officer completed the assessment without allowing the rebate to the assessee. Subsequently, the assessee applied under section 154 of the Act for rectification, claiming entitlement to the rebate. However, the application was rejected on the grounds that no claim was made in the return regarding the rebate, thus no mistake was apparent on the face of the record.

The Appellate Assistant Commissioner and the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal upheld the Income-tax Officer's decision, emphasizing that the assessee had not made any claim for rebate in the return. The Tribunal, in line with previous judicial decisions, held that relief under section 84 could only be granted if claimed in the return, and the absence of such claim precluded rectification under section 154.

The High Court, relying on precedent, affirmed that the Income-tax Officer did not commit a mistake when not allowing the rebate due to the absence of a claim in the return. Citing a previous case, the court held that rectification under section 154 was not applicable in such circumstances. Consequently, the court answered the question in favor of the department, allowing costs to the Commissioner of Income-tax.

In conclusion, the judgment clarified the importance of claiming rebate under section 84 in the income tax return to avail of the relief, emphasizing that rectification under section 154 cannot be sought if no claim was made initially. The decision underscored the significance of following procedural requirements for claiming tax benefits under the Income-tax Act.