Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + AT Income Tax - 2020 (9) TMI AT This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2020 (9) TMI 858 - AT - Income TaxExemption u/s 11 - charitable activity u/s 2(15) - Assessee i.e. Nari Utthan Sansthan is a charitable Institution, which is registered under Societies Registration Act and also under section 12AA - whether milk collection and distribution activity of assessee Trust was a business? - HELD THAT:- The assessee society was not at all indulged or involved in any kind of milk business. The activities of milk collecting and disbursement were only in the nature to support to women welfare. Such giving up of milk chilling plant and other allied facilities including equipment etc. held by NUS (assessee society) to FPO created and run by women beneficiaries fully substantiates that there was no business taken up by the assessee. Definition of the term ‘business’ as per section 2(13) of the Act defining it as ‘any trade, commerce, manufacturing activity or any adventure or concern in the nature of trade, commerce or manufacture.’ Purely and merely a hypothetical thought made by the A.O. without understanding the genuineness of the assessee’s case to treat milk collecting and disbursement activity as business carried out by the assessee. The milk collection and disbursement was only a support activity to achieve the purpose of women empowerment particularly that belonging to the backward rural area of the state of Rajasthan. Perusal of the list of various women beneficiaries further demonstrate that women beneficiaries under the project were including SC/ST/OBC/BPL, Widows as well as other needed section of the society - We can safely conclude that the milk collecting and disbursement activity by no means could be treated as business carried out by the assessee. The ‘charitable purpose’ carried out and ensured by the assessee trust may it be running an orphanage cum old age home in the name of ‘Snehalaya’ - Activity of milk collection and disbursement carried out by trust was only to provide a platform to disadvantaged women beneficiaries from rural background particularly being economically highly weaker areas therefore undoubtedly to be treated as charitable purposes promoting ‘relief to poor’. Accordingly, the A.O. was not justified in invoking proviso to Section 2(15) of the Act and denial of exemption under section 11 & 12 of the Act to the assessee society is unjustified under the facts and circumstances of the case. Separate books of accounts were not maintained by the assessee for milk trading as required u/s 11(4A) - HELD THAT:- We found that the assessee had got its books of accounts duly audited and submitted the details to the extent possible for the kind reference of the AO even. The milk collection and disbursement activity was conducted as per the scheme sanctioned by the donors only and the assessee did not itself carried out such activity on its own which distinguishes the requirement of following the provisions of section (4A) of section 11 of the Act in the facts and circumstances of the case. Observations recorded by learned CIT(A) in his appellate order allowed the ground of appeal raised by the assessee in its favour. The detailed findings given by the ld. CIT(A) at para 6 of his appellate order are as per material placed on record. Accordingly, we do not find any reason to interfere in the findings of the ld. CIT(A) wherein he held that the AO was not correct in holding that the assessee was required to maintain project wise books of accounts and thus, working out/addition of surplus held as erroneous. The ground of appeal is allowed. Application of fund on account of aid loans/advance - neither any assurance was given nor any affidavit was filed by the assessee society that these loans/advances given by it were not to be re-paid by these beneficiaries - HELD THAT:- The documents so filed during the assessment proceedings substantiates assessee’s claim in an explicit manner that the assessee society has distributed only aid / assistance amongst various beneficiaries which was never recovered back from them or was never paid back to the assessee society all. Out of the 11 statements recorded during the course of additional evidence proceedings not a single beneficiary accepted to have returned or repaid the amount disbursed to them. The actual facts are only that the amount distributed amongst women beneficiaries was aid / assistance only which was never returned back. Detailed finding has been recorded by the ld. CIT(A) which are as per material on record and do not require any interference. Accordingly, we do not find any infirmity in the order of the ld. CIT(A) in giving relief of ₹ 2.50 crores and directing the A.O. to recalculate accordingly the application of income and surplus. Corpus fund allowance - HELD THAT:- Assessee society has not claimed value of such assets in computation of application of income of the assessee trust which substantiates the assessee’s claim that the treatment of corpus fund as general fund is incorrect and unlawful. Even if the capital assets acquired were treated as general fund than corpus fund, the AO while computing the total income of the assessee society in his assessment order dated 30.03.2015 did not reduce such amount therefore again adopted an unlawful action on his part. A detailed finding has been recorded at page No. 26 of his appellate order at para 8.2 and after considering the various judicial pronouncements, directed the A.O. to treat sum of ₹ 60,95,870/- as corpus fund. Detailed finding so recorded by the ld. CIT(A) are as per the material on record and do not require any interference on our part. CIT(A) has dealt with each and every objection of the A.O. threadbare and after giving detailed findings, deleted the addition so made by the A.O. - Appeal of revenue dismissed.
|