Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding

🚨 Important Update for Our Users

We are transitioning to our new and improved portal - www.taxtmi.com - for a better experience.

⚠️ This portal will be discontinued on 31-07-2025

If you encounter any issues or problems while using the new portal,
please let us know via our feedback form so we can address them promptly.

  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases GST GST + HC GST - 2020 (11) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password



 

2020 (11) TMI 833 - HC - GST


Issues:
Bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. in connection with Criminal Complaint under Section 132 of Central Goods & Services Tax Act, 2017 (GST Act, 2017).

Analysis:

The petitioner filed a bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. alleging false implication in the case. The petitioner's counsel argued that the companies in question, deemed fake, were closed after obtaining NOC from the competent authority. It was highlighted that an amount of Rs. 2.6 crore had already been recovered from the petitioner. The petitioner had been in judicial custody since 08.01.2020, with a complaint filed against him on 05.03.2020. The counsel emphasized the absence of criminal antecedents and requested bail, citing the compoundable nature of the offence and a maximum sentence of 5 years under Section 132 of the GST Act, 2017.

On the contrary, the complainant's counsel opposed the bail application, pointing out grave allegations against the petitioner for fraudulently obtaining input tax credit and passing forged GST credit amounting to Rs. 33.50 crore. The investigation was still pending, leading to the argument that the petitioner did not merit bail.

Considering the arguments presented by both parties, the High Court evaluated the nature of allegations, the petitioner's custody duration, the ongoing investigation, the compoundable nature of the offence under Section 132 of the CGST Act, and the severity of punishment. Without expressing any opinion on the case's merits, the Court found it just to grant bail to the petitioner.

Consequently, the bail application was allowed, directing the release of the accused-petitioner upon furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000/- and two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court. The petitioner was instructed to comply with all conditions specified under Section 437(3) Cr.P.C.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates