Case Laws
Acts
Notifications
Circulars
Classification
Forms
Manuals
Articles
News
D. Forum
Highlights
Notes
🚨 Important Update for Our Users
We are transitioning to our new and improved portal - www.taxtmi.com - for a better experience.
⚠️ This portal will be fully migrated on 31-July-2025 at 23:59:59
After this date, all services will be available exclusively on our new platform.
If you encounter any issues or problems while using the new portal,
please let us know
via our feedback form
, with specific details, so we can address them promptly.
Home
1976 (11) TMI 72 - CGOVT - Central Excise
Issues:
1. Whether quantity discounts claimed by a company for goods used for captive consumption are admissible under the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944. Comprehensive Analysis: 1. The case involved M/s. Dharamsi Morarji Chemical Co. Ltd., who filed a price list for their sulphuric acid products, claiming discounts based on the quantity of goods consumed internally. The Superintendent of Central Excise observed the discounts claimed were for goods used in the company's plant for manufacturing fertilizers, considering it as "sale" for captive consumption. The company clarified that the assessable value for goods consumed internally should be based on production cost plus a reasonable profit margin. They argued that under section 4 of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944, the assessable value should be the price at which the goods are capable of being sold, after deducting quantity discounts given uniformly to bulk consumers. 2. The Asstt. Collector of Central Excise, Kelyan Division, held that the quantity discounts claimed for goods used for captive consumption were not admissible as trade discounts under the Act. The Appellate Collector admitted the company's appeal, stating that the assessable value should be determined based on the wholesale cash price for similar goods sold or capable of being sold, even for internal consumption, minus any applicable discounts if sold to independent buyers. 3. The Central Government issued a show cause notice challenging the Appellate Collector's order, arguing that the discounts were conditional on future transactions and not admissible under the Act. The company contended that the discounts were uniformly offered to consumers meeting specific quantity criteria and were adjusted if the full quantity was not purchased within the specified period. The Government referred to previous orders rejecting similar quantity discounts as conditional on future transactions. 4. The Government of India reviewed the submissions and past decisions, concluding that the quantity discounts offered by the company were indeed conditional on future transactions reaching a fixed figure of sales. Citing previous orders, the Government held that such conditional discounts were not admissible under the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944. Consequently, the order-in-appeal was set aside, and the original order disallowing the quantity discounts for captive consumption was reinstated.
|