Home Case Index All Cases Indian Laws Indian Laws + HC Indian Laws - 2022 (4) TMI HC This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2022 (4) TMI 922 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURTMaintainability of petition - initiation of proceedings against the petitioner alone who is an employee of the Company - party to the proceedings or not - it is contended that the Company which ran the chit fund is not made a party to these proceedings and unless, the Company is a party, the petition would not be maintainable - HELD THAT:- Petitioners are accused Nos. 1 and 2 in the very same Spl.C.C. No. 96/2016, which has been quashed by this Court for the reasons rendered therein. The petition is allowed and Spl.C.C. No. 96/2016 dated 22.02.2016 passed by the Principal City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru (CCH-1) stands quashed in the same terms as is directed in SRI SUDEEP SRINIVAS (REPRESENTED BY HIS GPA HOLDER SMT. PUSHPALATHA G., SMT. PREETHI RAMAMOHAN (REPRESENTED BY HER GPA HOLDER SMT. SHUBHA RAMMOHAN VERSUS STATE OF KARNATAKA BY THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY MALLESHWARAM, POLICE STATION, SATISH KUMAR B.P. [2021 (9) TMI 1373 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT] where it was held that The complaint itself was not maintainable without the corporate entity being made as a party but having brought only the Board of Directors or the officers of the Company as accused. Petition disposed off.
|