Case Laws
Acts
Notifications
Circulars
Classification
Forms
Manuals
Articles
News
D. Forum
Highlights
Notes
🚨 Important Update for Our Users
We are transitioning to our new and improved portal - www.taxtmi.com - for a better experience.
⚠️ This portal will be discontinued on 31-07-2025
If you encounter any issues or problems while using the new portal,
please
let us know via our feedback form
so we can address them promptly.
Home
2022 (10) TMI 342 - AT - Income TaxIncome deemed to accrue or arise in India - Income from the operation of aircrafts for the international traffic i.e. transportation of passengers and cargo - whether the collection charges paid by AAI to the assessee is income derived from operation of aircraft not liable to tax in India as per Article 8 of DTAA between India and Germany? - Whether CIT (A) erred in not accepting the contentions of the Appellant that collection charges allowed to the Appellant by Airport Authority of India (AAI) on payments made by them to AAI within a stipulated given period is a discount in nature and not in the nature of commission income taxable in the hands of the Appellant in India? - HELD THAT - As decided in own case 2022 (3) TMI 1432 - ITAT DELHI UDF is levied at the Indian airports as a measure to increase revenues of the airport operator. UDF is levied to brdge any revenue shortfall so that the airport operator is able to get a fair rate of return on investment. The quantum of UDF varies from airport to airport and the rate of UDF at airports is determined by the Airports Economic Regulatory Authority of India (AERA) for major airports and ministry of civil aviation for not major airports. Presently UDF collection charge at a flat rate of Rs.5/- per passenger (all inclusive) is allowed to airlines subject to payment of UDF collection to AAI within 15 days of receipt of bill. Airlines will make full payment of UDF to AAI and raise a separate invoice for the collection charges on UDF to AAI. The collection charges paid by AAI to the assessee in whatever name called i.e. either discount or commission is nothing but service charges paid for assessee collecting UDF and passing it on to AAI. The collection charges paid by AAI to assessee cannot be said to be the income derived from operation of aircraft. In assessee s case on identical facts for the assessment year 2013-14 the Ld. DRP approved the order of the assessing officer in holding that the collection charges received by the assessee from AAI on remitting the UDF within the stipulated time as income from business taxable in India and such income is not derived from operation of aircraft falling under Article 8 of DTAA between India and Germany. In these circumstances and for the above reasons we hold that the collection charges received by the assessee from AAI are not income derived from operation of aircraft falling under Article 8 of DTAA between India and Germany. Thus we confirm the orders of the Revenue authorities and accordingly assessee s appeal is dismissed.
|