Home Case Index All Cases Service Tax Service Tax + AT Service Tax - 2023 (3) TMI AT This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2023 (3) TMI 65 - AT - Service TaxDemand of interest under Section 75 of the Finance Act, 1994 - Non-payment of service tax - Intellectual Property Rights - it is alleged that the appellant had not discharged Service Tax immediately after making the provision for payment of Royalty and Technical Knowhow fees to their associate companies abroad. HELD THAT:- In the orders of the CESTAT Benches in M/s. Tata Consultancy Services Ltd. v. Commissioner of S.T., Mumbai [2015 (11) TMI 236 - CESTAT MUMBAI], M/s. Alstom T and D India Ltd. and Schneider Electric Infrastructure Ltd. v. Commissioner of Central Excise & Service Tax, LTU, Chennai & ors. [2018 (2) TMI 148 - CESTAT CHENNAI] and M/S. AREVA T&D INDIA LTD. VERSUS COMMISSIONER OF SERVICE TAX, CHENNAI. [2018 (4) TMI 1944 - CESTAT CHENNAI] relied upon by the Learned Advocate for the appellant, it has been held that in order to be categorized for the purpose of Service Tax under Intellectual Property Rights, such rights should have been registered with the Trademark / Patent authority in India as per the law for the time being in force. That is to say, as long as it is not legally recognized by the process under the Act, the same could not be considered as recognized by the law for the time being in force. In the case on hand, the appellant has categorically canvassed, which is also clear from the grounds-of-appeal urged, that wherever Royalty and Technical Knowhow fees were paid to the overseas entities, applicable Service Taxes have been discharged by the appellant and that it is only the interest which is the point of dispute and not the Service Tax. The scope of the appeals is limited, as contended by the appellant, to the demand of interest alone and when the orders of the CESTAT Benches are considered, it is found that since the liability itself was questionable, the Revenue is not justified in demanding the interest also. Appeal allowed.
|