Case Laws
Acts
Notifications
Circulars
Classification
Forms
Manuals
Articles
News
D. Forum
Highlights
Notes
🚨 Important Update for Our Users
We are transitioning to our new and improved portal - www.taxtmi.com - for a better experience.
⚠️ This portal will be discontinued on 31-07-2025
If you encounter any issues or problems while using the new portal,
please
let us know via our feedback form
so we can address them promptly.
Home
The petitioners, engaged in the business of exporting and importing man-made fibers, imported acrylic fiber and claimed a duty exemption based on a notification under the Central Excise Rules. The High Court held that the duty levied on imported acrylic fiber cannot be equated with the duty on domestically manufactured fiber, denying the petitioners' claim for relief. The petition was dismissed, and the rule was discharged with costs. The respondents were allowed to enforce the Bank guarantee along with interest.
|