Home Case Index All Cases VAT and Sales Tax VAT and Sales Tax + HC VAT and Sales Tax - 2023 (6) TMI HC This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2023 (6) TMI 188 - HC - VAT and Sales TaxAvailment of irregular Input Tax Credit (ITC) - evasion of tax - forged and fabricated invoices against bogus purchases to credit bogus ITC - grant of registration certificate only for resale of nuts and bolts and HR sheets but illegal trading in iron and steel also done - HELD THAT:- Section 57 of the Act provides for imposition of penalty for issuance of false invoice. Section 58 of the Act provides for imposition of penalty for using a false registration number. A perusal of both the above provisions leaves no manner of doubt that the allegations levelled in the FIR in question are squarely covered and fall under the exclusive purview of the Act - It would be pertinent to note here that the Act is a complete Code in itself and there is no provision provided in the Act for the registration of an FIR. The Act only provides for imposition of penalty in case there is any contravention of its provisions. Since the Act is a special law, principle of generalia specialibus non derogant would apply, meaning thereby, it would operate in exclusion to the general law i.e. the IPC. A Coordinate Bench of this Court in Pritpal Singh Vs. State of Punjab [2012 (3) TMI 576 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT], while relying upon a judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court in Dilawar Singh's case [2005 (11) TMI 502 - SUPREME COURT] held that the provision of the Act are sufficient and equipped to deal with the matter where an attempt is made to evade the Tax and the registration of FIR in such like matter is totally an abuse of the process of law. This Court has no hesitation to hold that continuation of criminal proceedings arising out of the FIR would be nothing but an abuse of process of the process of law - Petition allowed.
|