Home Case Index All Cases Service Tax Service Tax + AT Service Tax - 2023 (7) TMI AT This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2023 (7) TMI 918 - AT - Service TaxLevy of penalty - providing internet service to customers through cable - service tax liability accepted - HELD THAT:- The issue is no longer res integra having been decided by the Tribunal in the case of M/S CITY CABLE OPERA VERSUS C.C.E CHANDIGARH [2020 (2) TMI 227 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH] where though the issue has been decided in favour of the Revenue, the appellant’s contention on penalty need to be examined. Reliance placed in the case of COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE VERSUS M/S. PANNU PROPERTY DEALERS, LUDHIANA [2010 (7) TMI 255 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT] where the Hon’ble High Court did not categorically hold that the imposition of penalty under Section 76 and Section 78 separately is not mutually exclusive prior to 10.05.2008, Hon’ble High Court has certainly held that the Appellate Authority was within its right to hold that the penalty is mutually exclusive and in the spirit of the amendment. While the amount involved in the above case was Rs.51,026/-, the amount involved in the instant case is about half that amount. Therefore, in deference to the jurisdictional High Court’s order, the penalty under Section 76 and 78 can be seen to be mutually exclusive even before the amendment. In the facts and circumstances of the case and looking into the fast changes that were coming in the Service Tax law during the relevant period, it can be concluded that the appellant being a small operator had no wherewithal to keep track of the law and thus, the applicability of the Service Tax to him, more so looking into the fact that the main cable operator M/s SIFY had discharged Service Tax on the entire amount collected from the customers, there are reasons to believe that there were sufficient reasons for the appellant in not discharging the applicable Service Tax. Looking into the conduct of the appellants in depositing the tax with interest and 25% penalty the provisions of Section 80 are invited and the benefits of Section 80 can be extended to the appellants. The penalties imposed are not sustainable - Appeal allowed in part.
|