Home Case Index All Cases Insolvency and Bankruptcy Insolvency and Bankruptcy + AT Insolvency and Bankruptcy - 2023 (8) TMI AT This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2023 (8) TMI 482 - AT - Insolvency and BankruptcyMaintainability of application filed u/s 7 of IBC - barred by time limitation or not - Appellant, contends that the Adjudicating Authority/ Tribunal, had failed to appreciate that the Claim of the 1st Respondent / Petitioner / Financial Creditor, was hopelessly barred by Limitation - HELD THAT:- Dealing with the aspect of Reply Notice, dated 19.06.2019, issued on behalf of the Corporate Debtor (for the Legal Notice, dated 10.06.2019), issued by the 1st Respondent / Bank / Financial Creditor, the Paragraph 2 of the said Reply, makes a reference to the Financial Turmoil, faced by the Corporate Debtor, in the recent past, resulting to Non payment of Loan Amount, and the discussion both had with O.T.S. Proposal, for Fourteen Cr., which was under due consideration, etc. - an admission, is the best peace of evidence, which can be used against the Maker, and this can be taken advantage of, by a Party, which places reliance, so as to bind, the said Maker. This Tribunal, to point out an admission, is not a self serving statement, but it is a self harming one. An Admission, is Confession or Voluntary Acknowledgement, made by a Party or Someone, identified with him, in legal interest, of the existence of certain facts, which are in issue or relevant to an issue, in the case, as per decision - It cannot be forgotten that the Corporate Debtor, had acknowledged the Debt, by offering One Time Settlement Proposal for Rs.14 Crore, through a Letter dated 03.03.2018. Also that the OTS Letters (sent by the ‘Corporate Debtor’), 13.07.2021, 03.08.2021, 31.12.2021, 04.01.2022 and 13.01.2022, were rejected by the 1st Respondent / Bank / Financial Creditor, as not Financially viable. An Unconditional Acknowledgment, is held to imply, a promise, to pay as per decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India, in Hiralal & Ors. Badkulal, [1953 (3) TMI 36 - SUPREME COURT]. An Acknowledgement, extends the Limitation Period. No wonder, an Acknowledgement, contained in the Balance Sheet of the Company, begins a fresh commencing point of Limitation - Undoubtedly, if any documents is executed, during the subsistence of Limitation, thereby the Dues, are / were acknowledged, the Limitation, will be revived, afresh, from the Date of Acknowledgement. In the instant case, the Default, committed by the Corporate Debtor, in respect of the Financial Debt, is more than Threshold Limit of Rs. 1 Crore (vide Section 4 of the Code, after amendment) - In the present case, as on date, for the Loan Facilities, provided by the 1st Respondent / Bank, to the Corporate Debtor, a Sum of Rs.239,51,53,055.83/-, being the Due Default Amount, committed by the Corporate Debtor. If there is any Financial Debt and Default, in repayment of the same, by the Corporate Debtor, then, an Adjudicating Authority/ Tribunal, by exercising its Discretion, after subjectively satisfying, itself that a Default, was committed by the Corporate Debtor, then, the Section 7 Application, filed by the Financial Creditor, can be admitted, under the I & B Code, 2016. In the instant case on hand, the Adjudicating Authority / Tribunal, on the available materials on record, came to an ultimate conclusion that the Corporate Debtor, had committed Default, in respect of the Debt, to be paid by it, to and in favour of the 1st Respondent / Bank. Indeed, the Section 7 Application, was admitted, by the Adjudicating Authority / Tribunal through its impugned order, dated 06.05.2022, and appointed, an Interim Resolution Professional and declared Moratorium, etc., which is free from any Legal Infirmities. Appeal dismissed.
|