Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding

🚨 Important Update for Our Users

We are transitioning to our new and improved portal - www.taxtmi.com - for a better experience.

⚠️ This portal will be fully migrated on 31-July-2025 at 23:59:59

After this date, all services will be available exclusively on our new platform.

If you encounter any issues or problems while using the new portal,
please let us know via our feedback form , with specific details, so we can address them promptly.

  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + HC Central Excise - 1996 (12) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password



 

1996 (12) TMI 73 - HC - Central Excise

Issues:
Petition for quashment of show cause notice and seizure memo, legality of Circular No. 194/28/96-CX.

Analysis:
The petitioner, a public limited company manufacturing explosives, sought to exclude interest component from excise duty based on Supreme Court decisions. The Circular issued by the Central Board of Excise and Customs was challenged as contradictory to established law. The petitioner contended that interest being receivable, excise duty should not apply. The Superintendent of Central Excise was urged to consider this argument but instead issued a show cause notice for penalty and seizure.

The respondents argued that the Supreme Court's earlier decision had been reviewed and interest on receivables was to be paid only after 21 days as per the terms of payment. The department requested evidence from the petitioner to show that payments were received after the stipulated period, which the petitioner failed to provide. The Court noted that if such evidence is presented, the interest could be excluded from excise duty as per the law.

The Court directed the petitioner to appear before the assessing authority with evidence that interest on the sold commodities was received after the stipulated period. The assessing authority was instructed to consider this evidence and pass appropriate orders in line with the Supreme Court's decisions. The petitioner was given the opportunity to file a fresh representation and the assessing authority was required to decide after providing a hearing to the petitioner.

In conclusion, the petition was disposed of with no costs, emphasizing the need for the petitioner to provide evidence to support their claim regarding the timing of interest payments to potentially exclude it from excise duty.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates