Home Case Index All Cases Customs Customs + SC Customs - 2002 (3) TMI SC This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2002 (3) TMI 48 - SC - CustomsConviction and sentence of the appellant under Sections 17, 18 and 21 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 challenged Held that:- Law on the point is very clear that even if there is any sort of procedural illegality in conducting the search and seizure, the evidence collected thereby will not become inadmissible and the Court would consider all the circumstances and find out whether any serious prejudice had been caused to the accused. If the search and seizure was in complete defiance of the law and procedure and there was any possibility of the evidence collected likely to have been tampered with or interpolated during the course of such search or seizure, then, it could be said that the evidence is not liable to be admissible in evidence. In the present case, though the mahazar was not prepared at the spot where the accused persons were found to be in possession of the contraband article but the same was done only at the Office of the Customs Department while the accused persons were very much present throughout, there was no allegation or suggestion that the contraband article was, in any way, meddled with by the officers. Therefore, we are of the view that the appellant has rightly been found to be in possession of the opium. We find no reason to interfere with the conviction and sentence entered against the appellant. The appeal is dismissed
|