TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Indian Laws Indian Laws + SCH Indian Laws - 2023 (10) TMI SCH This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2023 (10) TMI 1527 - SCH - Indian Laws


Summary:The Supreme Court addressed the issue of service of notice when returned as "unclaimed." Citing K. Bhaskaran v. Sankaran Vaidhyan Balan (1999) 7 SCC 510 and Ajeet Seeds Ltd. v. K. Gopala Krishnaiah (2014) 12 SCC 685, the Court held that such a return is deemed proper service. Specifically, relying on Section 27 of the General Clauses Act, 1897 and Section 114 of the Evidence Act, 1872, the Court stated:"...service of notice has been effected when it is sent to the correct address by registered post... Unless and until the contrary is proved by the addressee, service of notice is deemed to have been effected at the time at which the letter would have been delivered in the ordinary course of business."The Court rejected the Registry's view that "unclaimed" return is incomplete service, equating "refusal" and "unclaimed" as synonymous for service purposes. Consequently, service of notice returned as unclaimed is "deemed to be served," despite no appearance by the respondent. The Registry was directed to list the matter accordingly.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates