Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 2002 (2) TMI AT This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2002 (2) TMI 149 - CEGAT, NEW DELHIExtract: .......re is no disclosure, even in the abatement claim, of the stock position of product. The mandatory condition laid down under clause (d) was not fulfilled by the appellants in relation to the period, 3-2-98 to 10-2-98. Therefore, I hold that the Commissioner has rightly rejected the abatement claim for this period. The appeal is thus allowed in part.
|